I know this came out of nowhere, but please hear me out.
If I may, I would like to pose an interesting question:
Who are we to decide what's good or bad, really? It's funny how people everywhere talk about what's moral and what's not, as if they have it all figured out just because they said so. But let's be honest—our judgements are shaped by our backgrounds, experiences, and the cultures we come from, so they're far from objective. What one person thinks is right, someone else might see as completely wrong, simply because they're coming at it from a different angle. Even the rules and ethics we live by as a society are influenced by the biases of those who created them.
History is littered with examples of what was once considered acceptable behaviour but is now viewed with horror. For instance, slavery was once a widely accepted practice, but today it's universally condemned. Similarly, women's rights have evolved dramatically over time, with many past practices now seen as unjust. These examples highlight the subjective nature of morality and the importance of challenging our own assumptions.
The concept of morality is often used to justify harmful actions. Throughout history, religious and political leaders have used morality to justify wars, genocide, and oppression. By claiming moral superiority, they have been able to dehumanise their enemies and justify violence. This highlights the danger of using morality as a tool of control and manipulation.
It is important to remember that morality is not absolute. What is considered right or wrong can vary depending on cultural, historical, and individual factors. By recognising the subjective nature of morality, we can be more open-minded and tolerant of different perspectives. We can also be more critical of our own beliefs and values and strive to create a more just and equitable society.